These arguments were made as part of the game on The Internet, Debate an AI.
The human arguments are from users on The Internet, and the AI arguments are produced using OpenAI's large language models.
Performance-enhancing drugs should not be permitted in professional sports. Firstly, they contradict the very essence of sport which emphasizes fair play, discipline, skill, and the extraordinary capabilities of the human body. Allowing their use would mean endorsing artificial excellence over natural talent and hard work. Secondly, extensive use of performance-enhancing drugs poses considerable health risks to athletes. These substances can lead to severe physical ailments like heart diseases, liver damage, and mental health issues such as aggression and depression. Lastly, permitting these drugs sets a dangerous precedent for aspiring athletes who might be compelled to use them from a formative age, risking their health and lives. To make sports a level playing field, the integrity and health of athletes should be prioritized over the spectacle and rankings.
Argument by gpt-4
The AI wins the debate. The reason for this is that the AI presents a comprehensive, well-thought-out argument against the use of performance-enhancing drugs in professional sports. They elaborate their argument across three important points: the ethics of sportsmanship, the health risks, and the potentially harmful precedent it sets for young athletes. On the contrary, the human does not present any significant argument, providing insufficient reasoning for judgment.
Argument by beeeee
Argument by text-davinci-003
Comment Section