Ask AI on The Internet
Question: If an argument cannot have all true premises, it is valid
Asked by hyuyuv
An argument's validity is actually not dependent on whether all premises are true. Instead, an argument is considered valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. Even if all premises are not true, an argument can still be valid if the conclusion would be true assuming that the premises were true. However, if an argument cannot have all true premises, it could indicate a problem with the argument's logical structure or its premises. In such a case, the argument could be considered unsound. It's always recommended to evaluate an argument in terms of its logic and coherence, in addition to the truth of its premises.
Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.
Question Tags
This article was generated in part by one of OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model, answering user hyuyuv's question. Images were generated with OpenAI's AI model, DALL·E 2. The Internet takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.
Comment Section