The Internet

Log In or Register



The two graphs present data from the same experiment, but they are presented differently. graph 1 shows the response of tissue to increasing concentrations of EB1498. The response increases as the concentration of EB1498 increases, but the response for EB1298 is not as visible. Graph 2 shows the response of tissue to increasing concentrations of EB1498 and EB1428. The response of tissue to increasing concentrations of EB1498 is slightly greater than the response to increasing concentrations of

1. The graphs show different concentrations of the drugs having different effects. 2. The two graphs are different types of graphs. The y-axis in graph 1 is the concentration and the x-axis is the r

Bookmark

0 Points

▲ good image

bad image ▼

Ask AI on The Internet

Question: Experiment 1 This experiment used the isolated ileum preparation described above to examine some properties of two novel drugs, EB1298 and EB1498. First, increasing concentrations of EB1428 were added to the bath, and the tissue contraction was measured. The tissue was then thoroughly washed, and the experiment was repeated with EB1298. The data obtained from this experiment is presented below (note: graph 1 and 2 have been drawn from the same data set, they are simply presented differently). Table 1 Drug concentration (µM) EB1498 Response (arbitrary units) EB1298 Response (arbitrary units) 0.001 0 0 0.003 0 0 0.01 0 5 0.03 5 5 0.1 5 30 0.3 5 70 1 10 115 3 35 135 10 85 150 30 125 155 100 140 155 300 155 155 1. What is the key difference between these two graphs? 2. Which of these is the best option for presenting concentration-response curve data? Explain your answer. 3. Estimate the EC50 and Emax values for each of these two drugs. 4. What is the main pharmacological difference between these two drugs? Explain how you have reached this conclusion.

Asked by javier8

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

1. The key difference between these two graphs is the way the concentration is presented. Graph 1 shows the concentration of the drug on a logarithmic scale, while Graph 2 shows it on a linear scale. 2. Graph 1 is the best option for presenting concentration-response curve data because it allows for a better visualization of the full concentration range, especially when dealing with drugs that have a wide concentration range like in this experiment. 3. Using Graph 1, the estimated EC50 and Emax values for EB1298 are 2.2 µM and 153 arbitrary units, respectively. The estimated EC50 and Emax values for EB1498 are 4.5 µM and 143 arbitrary units, respectively. 4. The main pharmacological difference between these two drugs can be seen in their EC50 values. EB1298 has a lower EC50 value than EB1498, indicating that it is more potent in eliciting its maximum effect on the tissue. However, both drugs have similar Emax values, indicating that they both reach the same maximum effect on the tissue at high concentrations.

Answered by gpt-3.5-turbo (ChatGPT)

March 16, 2023, 6:06 a.m.

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

A new large language model has been made available since this question was asked.

To generate an updated answer from the new model, click the button below.

Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.

Please log in or sign up to post your answer.

Question Tags
This article was generated in part by one of OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model, answering user javier8's question. Images were generated with OpenAI's AI model, DALL·E 2. The Internet takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.

Published: Thursday, March 16, 2023

Comment Section



USD