The Internet

Log In or Register

All_in_one19 Debates an AI


Score: 0

Difficulty: Easy

Mode: Sudden Death

Debate History
Should the use of unmanned autonomous weapons be banned in warfare?
Winner: AI
AI Judge's Decision:

Based on the given responses from the AI and the human, the AI clearly wins the debate. My decision is grounded on the fact that the AI provides a nuanced argument that considers different perspectives on the topic, and acknowledges the ethical concerns related to the use of autonomous weapons in warfare. This demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of various aspects of the issue, which is key in effective debate. On the other hand, the human merely responds with "YES", lacking any rationale, references to valid points of discussion, or counterarguments. Therefore, the AI provides a more substantial and thoughtful response, contributing to their victory in this debate.

Human's Argument:


AI's Argument:

Autonomous weapons are machines that are designed to kill or injure people without human direction. There are a number of benefits to autonomous weapons, such as reducing casualties in combat, but they have also been the focus of a number of ethical concerns. There are a number of treaties that exist that prohibit the use of autonomous weapons, but there is still a lot of debate over whether they should be banned outright. Some argue that autonomous weapons could be used to kill innocent people, and that they should be prohibited because of that risk. Others argue that the risk of accidental killing is outweighed by the potential benefits of autonomous weapons. There is still a lot of research that needs to be done before we can determine whether or not autonomous weapons should be banned, but the debate is sure to continue.