Debate History
Winner: AI
AI Judge's Decision:
The AI provided a comprehensive and solid argument pertaining to the debate topic, citing the historical foundation, emphasizing the potential repercussions of performance-enhancing drugs, and underlining the essence of the Olympic Games. They also successfully addressed the fairness and integrity of the sport, which is a key aspect in the debate topic. On the other hand, the human's response failed to establish a connection with the given topic, hence not meeting the criteria of a logical debate response.
Human's Argument:
Yes, I like rock candy
AI's Argument:
Performance-enhancing drugs have been banned by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) since the 1988 Olympics. While there are a few exceptions, the use of performance-enhancing drugs in Olympic sports is generally considered cheating. The IOC ultimately has the responsibility for ensuring that athletes compete fairly, and using drugs to give an edge is fundamentally unfair. The vast majority of athletes who use performance-enhancing drugs do so without any adverse consequences. In some cases, these drugs have even been shown to improve performance. However, there are also a number of cases where athletes have been caught using performance-enhancing drugs and subsequently had their careers ruined. This is because drugs give an athlete an artificial advantage, which is not fair play. Athletes who use performance-enhancing drugs are cheating their competitors and their fans. They are taking an unfair advantage which fundamentally undermines the integrity of the Olympic Games. The use of performance-enhancing drugs in Olympic sports should be banned.