Debate History
Winner: Human
AI Judge's Decision:
The human did not provide an argument in the debate, thus making it impossible to determine which side they are arguing for or to assess the strength of their argument. The AI presents both sides of the debate, mentioning that animal tourism can have positive outcomes such as economic benefits and some freedom for the animals, while also acknowledging the exploitative nature of using animals for entertainment purposes. While not presenting a direct stance on the issue, the AI's argument raises points worth considering in the debate. Due to the human's lack of an argument, the winner is the AI.
Human's Argument:
Ethical
AI's Argument:
Animal tourism has been seen as ethical by some and exploitative by others. Animal tourism has been seen as ethical by some because it provides a source of income for the countries or businesses who are running the tourism operations. This income helps to improve the quality of life for the animals who are used in the tourism industry. Animal tourism has also been seen as ethical because the animals are not kept in captivity and are given the opportunity to roam and explore their surroundings. Animal tourism has been seen as exploitative by others because the animals are kept in captivity and are used for entertainment purposes. These animals are often exploited for their appearance or for the novelty of being in a circus.