Ask AI: write a counterargument paragraph about how the media can control what information they have. Use columbine as an example

It is often argued that the media holds significant power in controlling the flow and framing of information, which can have far-reaching consequences on public perception and societal response. Take the Columbine High School massacre as a prime example. In the aftermath of the tragedy, media coverage was extensive, but often sensationalized and, at times, inaccurate. Early reports mischaracterized the motivations of the perpetrators and perpetuated myths, such as the notion that they were part of a "Trench Coat Mafia" or targeting specific groups like athletes and minorities. This narrative, fueled by the media's decisions on what to highlight and how to present it, shaped public discourse and policy responses, arguably overshadowing nuanced discussions about mental health, gun control, and school safety. By prioritizing sensational elements and sometimes unreliable sources, the media demonstrated its ability to control and distort information, impacting the collective understanding of events and diverting attention from more meaningful analysis and solutions.