The Internet

Log In or Register

Illustration depicting military personnel in the background ignoring misconduct while a few individuals engage in inappropriate behavior.

Unveiling the Bystander Effect: Exploring its Role in the Abu Ghraib Military Scandal

Bookmark

0 Points

▲ good image

bad image ▼

Ask AI on The Internet

Question: Discuss how the bystander effect played a role in the military personnel that were involved in Abu Ghraib. Although the military personnel were considered normal people, how did the bystander effect influence them to commit heinous acts?

Asked by kay

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

The bystander effect refers to the social psychological phenomenon where individuals are less likely to help a victim when other people are present, often because they believe someone else will intervene. It often causes people to displace responsibility, resulting in inaction. In the context of Abu Ghraib, a former U.S. Army detention center in Iraq where considerable human rights violations were reported, the bystander effect indeed played a significant role among the Military Police personnel involved. Despite being normal individuals under normal circumstances, they were implicated in the abuse and torture of prisoners. This can partially be attributed to a combination of the bystander effect and a phenomenon labeled as “diffusion of responsibility”. These military personnel possibly believed that they were not directly accountable for their actions as they were following orders from their superiors, this sense of diffusion of responsibility made it easier for them to engage in such acts. Added to this, they might have thought others around them would intervene if their actions were wrong, which is essentially what bystander effect suggests. Coupled with this, the deindividuation resulting from being a part of a large group, such as the military, may have enabled them to lose their sense of individuality and moral judgement, causing a loss of self-awareness and increasing likelihood of unpredictable behavior that contradicts personal norms. In such tense, chaotic, and unclear situations like in Abu Ghraib, the establishment of a clear chain of responsibility and firm leadership is essential to prevent such acts. It's important to regularly reinforce expectations of conduct and ethics, especially in military environments. Regular psychological support and voicing concerns should also be encouraged. However, it's crucial to understand that while the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility may provide some explanation, they do not justify or excuse these actions. The military personnel involved were still accountable for their individual actions and decisions.

Answered by gpt-4

March 27, 2024, 8:39 p.m.

0 Points

Log In or Register to Vote

Think your answer is better than the AI's? Post it below.

Please log in or sign up to post your answer.

This article was generated in part by one of OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model, answering user kay's question. Images were generated with OpenAI's AI model, DALL·E 2. The Internet takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
If you want your question answered by an AI, click here.

Published: Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Comment Section



USD